Science fiction often scares us with machines that can think for themselves. In the early days of Excel, the AutoFill feature must have looked like the free-thinking computer had arrived, but it is a harmless, if very useful time-saver
A recurrent theme in the world of science fiction is the free thinking machine or robot that can feel human emotions and cause terror to mankind. The child robot David in the 2001 film Artificial Intelligence saw Martin, the returning human son, as a rival and so tried to drown him; the murderous HAL in 2001 a Space Odyssey attempted to kill the astronauts who had been ordered to switch him off, and I remember in an early edition of Spider Man comic, the web-slinger was called into action to stop a robot that was running amok on campus.
There will always be a fascination in machines that can think for themselves and one day we may see the advent of a computer we can interact with as though it were another human. In the meantime we have many examples of computing that appears to think for itself, from computerised chess games that have been around for decades to the automatic functions in Excel. The latter are pretty much taken for granted today, but in the early days watching Excel predict what you were about to type must have seemed like the computer had a mind of its own.
Of course functions such as AutoFill are not examples of free thinking, but merely the computer doing what it has been programmed to do, and, as such, it is susceptible to mistakes made by the operator.
For example, if you wanted to number a column from 1-100 then a lot of time can be saved by simply typing 1 and 2 and then dragging the AutoFill handle (at the bottom right of the cell) down another 98 cells. However, if you make a slip with the mouse, or you are unfamiliar with how AutoFill works, and you select only the lower of the two cells, then your AutoFill will show only a number 2 in each cell. This is because it has not been given all of the information and it has no increment on which to base what it displays.
To avoid making this sort of mistake, it is possible to use AutoFill to fill the column as described above without giving it any increment and by typing the value 1 only. Simply insert your 1 into the desired cell and hold down the Ctrl key. Then when you drag the Autofill handle down you will see the following values appear. This shortcut will only display data in increments of 1, and it does not work with other predictable data, such as days of the week or months of the year, but then it doesn't need to.
Whereas with numbers you need to tell AutoFill the increment you want, days and months are generally used in the order they occur and so you need type only one and AutoFill will get the message. As is the case with functions on all Office applications, a lot can be learned by exploring AutoFill and finding out for yourself how it can save you time and keystrokes.
If you want to disable the AutoFill function for some reason, then this is how to do it. For pre-2007 versions of Excel, go to Tools/Options/Edit and deselect the tick box on Allow Cell Drag and Drop, then click OK.
For Excel 2007 click the Office button and select Excel Options. Click Advanced and in Editing Options deselect the Enable Fill Handle and Cell Drag-and-Drop tick box.
Having said that, I can see no reason to switch off such a great time-saver as the AutoFill function, other than the small handle on the bottom right corner may be distracting to a new user. So continue to use it and save time every day, and who knows, maybe the day will come when you will be training a robot that sits at your desk how to save time by using AutoFill.
You have permission to publish this article for free providing the "About the Author" box is included in its entirety.
Do not post/reprint this article in any site or publication that contains hate, violence, porn, warez, or supports illegal activity.
Do not use this article in violation of the US CAN-SPAM Act. If sent by email, this article must be delivered to opt-in subscribers only.
If you publish this article in a format that supports linking, please ensure that all URLs and email addresses are active links, without the rel='nofollow' tag.
Software Training London Ltd. owns this article. Please respect the author's copyright and above publication guidelines.
If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use this article.
Crown Prosecution Service Case Administrator Matthew Johnson
"Despite being a virtual course, it still felt very 'in-person' and the use of teams was particularly effective. Alistair was an enthusiastic and positive trainer and I would highly recommend him and STL. The only thing I would possible change is the reliance on role playing activities. Lots of people don't like being put on the spot or feel uncomfortable in those situations so the option to opt-out would be appreciated."
Royal Horticultural Society Learning & Development Trainer Talia Sender-galloway
"Great experience and loads covered. Thank you Doug you were brilliant. Very personable friendly and helpful. As the course was new to me I found the afternoon went into a little too many topics so I would have prefered a recap of the morning and to try them out on some complex exercises. Saying that, I am aware that it is because all of the areas are new to me and others may have found them more useful."
Alten Ltd Consultant Thomas Broadhead
"Pace was spot on, quite a lot of info over the two days and never felt swamped. Maybe some post-course info on more DAX formula, it seems like we were just dipping our toes in. I'm also guessing that your DAX course probably covers this!"