Scope creep. It is the bane of every project manager, and yet it is inevitable. Unless you have planned for it, your schedule will be in a shambles, your project late, and your clients unhappy.
What is Scope Creep?
After a plan has been created in Microsoft Project it is inevitable that changes will be made. As the project proceeds, tasks will need to be added. For example when developing a new product, people might think of features which will supposedly make the product better.
Creep can come from many sources. Managers may promise features to clients without consulting staff to see if they are feasible. New workers on the project often have ideas that can seem good at the time. Embarking on the project often reveals flaws with the original plan, requiring additional tasks to cover shortcomings.
Use Buffers to Absorb Scope Creep
Well developed plans in Microsoft Project have a certain amount of leeway for exactly these situations. It's critical to budget extra time into schedules to cover the implementation of additional ideas. If the extra time has been used up, or wasn't planned for in the first place, there may be other places that time can be borrowed from. Time planned for researching competing products or usability testing could be reduced to allow the implementation of new tasks.
Be careful. It is common for companies to spend so much time adding more that they use up all of their testing time. They release a product with lots of cool features, none of which work well. Don't lose sight of quality when taking time to absorb scope creep.
You Can't Manufacture Time
Most Microsoft Project endeavours eventually reach the point where there is no time left for more tasks. At this stage there are only two options.
The first is to pare down the feature list. Although every feature might seem critical at the time, once you start comparing them you learn which ones are actually critical and which just sound cool. Often this makes a better product. During the development of Microsoft Excel 5, programmers had to cut lots of "critical" features to get the product out. When starting Excel 6, they looked over the list of cut features and realized that not one of them was worth implementing in the new version.
The second choice is to extend the schedule. If the additional work really is necessary, it's going to take more time to implement it. If your deadline is not changeable, then see the preceding paragraph.
One choice you don't have is to expect your staff to work beyond their capacities. This common management mistake makes the situation worse. Staff becomes burned out and makes more mistakes, requiring more fixes, and a late product. Tasks take as long as they take and workers can put in only so many hours.
Scope creep has doomed many a project, but with the right preparations your project will survive it.
You have permission to publish this article for free providing the "About the Author" box is included in its entirety.
Do not post/reprint this article in any site or publication that contains hate, violence, porn, warez, or supports illegal activity.
Do not use this article in violation of the US CAN-SPAM Act. If sent by email, this article must be delivered to opt-in subscribers only.
If you publish this article in a format that supports linking, please ensure that all URLs and email addresses are active links, without the rel='nofollow' tag.
Software Training London Ltd. owns this article. Please respect the author's copyright and above publication guidelines.
If you do not agree to these terms, please do not use this article.
National Police Improvement Agency Finance Business Partner Andrew New
"Excellet course with dedicated tutors that want you to understand the course contents not just wrote learn from a powerpoint presentation. each student although in a class of ten is felt to be as important as the next person and given any help required.
Would suggest extending the course by one day to include more on pivot table or other things not included such as heat maps etc. This could also be assisted by moving at a slightly faster pace.
Getting students to write in with a practical problem up to two weeks before the course, so a real life example can be used."
IOM William McAuley
"Good course, enjoyed, trainer very helpful."
GMP Chief Officer Delegate Martin Dickinson
"Enjoyed the course, the subjects and topics are simple and can easily be related to both work and social life. Nothing is overly complex and too academic, lots of common sense. You can relate to how aspects are already done subconsciously but explains the reasoning behind this."